Video surveillance: pros and cons - overview

The use of special cameras for video surveillance is supposed to help prevent and solve crimes. However, there is always a debate about the use of video surveillance. What arguments there are pro and contra video surveillance, we explain in this article.

Pro and Con: Where video surveillance is used

Cameras for video surveillance are not only used by private individuals to protect their own home or property, but are also used in many businesses or stores. Video surveillance is also increasingly used in public places such as airports or train stations to protect people from crime. Regardless of where video surveillance is used, certain rules must be observed when using it. For example, while surveillance cameras are allowed to film their own property, they are prohibited from recording neighboring properties and public roads. In addition, the installer of the cameras must inform his visitors about the use of the video cameras.

Video surveillance: These pro and con arguments there are

Although there are clear rules regarding the use of surveillance cameras, their use is always controversially discussed.

1. So proponents of video surveillance argue that this helps citizens feel safer and crimes such as burglaries or thefts can be solved faster.
2. In addition, the cameras would deter offenders and thus help to prevent crimes.
3. In contrast, opponents of video surveillance see in this a massive encroachment on the personal rights of the individual and warn of data protection problems.
4. In addition, there is the danger of a hacker attack and possible misuse of the recorded images in the video surveillance cameras.